County (2010), the latest wife (petitioner) got currently instituted the continuing not as much as Sec
Hemlataben v. State (2010)
In the case of Hemlataben v. 125 Cr Desktop. significantly less than that restoration to possess their particular son try invited in the 750/- rupees monthly. The new petitioner wasn’t considering one maintenance given that she are doing work in the a manufacturing plant and you may obtained 2500/- rupees each month that was adequate to look after herself.
The brand new partner prayed getting maintenance just before learned Magistrate within the PWDV Work and then he provided the newest prayer. The latest husband confronted the order and also the A lot more Coaching Courtroom ignored the transaction of the Magistrate.
The new petitioner confronted your order of one’s Even more Instructions Court inside the the fresh Gujarat Large Court and you can Justice Akil Qureshi seen that the Magistrate cannot enjoys sexy Mae hong son girls granted maintenance up to and unless good grounds is mentioned. The excess Instructions Court the amount of time no error into the putting aside the fresh new order of one’s learned Magistrate to offer repairs with the petitioner. (more…)
